← Search

Stephanie Guggenheim

Palos Verdes Estates, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 74W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Guggenheim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-08-23 · BC-WestEnd/ReginaEsperanza9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracy Hyman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · BC-WestEnd/ReginaEsperanza9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracy Hyman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Kredel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · OC Seal Beach - Kathy - Sun · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nikki Nance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Uyeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-28 · BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyes4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · OC Seal Beach - Kathy - Sun · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christy Akin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-24 · BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyes4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Hirata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Uyeda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Kredel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyes4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christeen Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
56.2%
41W–32L · 54.4% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.2% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 56.1% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.4% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.4% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.8% of games
9.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams