← Search

Sutherlyn Brinn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesapeake, VA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
115 matches · 63W–52L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history115 matches
L
2026-10-22 · McMahon - Deucebags · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-15 · McMahon - Deucebags · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-08 · McMahon - Deucebags · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mitchell Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-17 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bartholomew
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-03 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bartholomew
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bartholomew
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen van Daniker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-19 · Bracey - Mixed Cocktail · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Sweitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-14 · Bracey - Mixed Cocktail · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Sweitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · Bracey - Mixed Cocktail · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Sweitzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-18 · Bracey - Mixed Cocktail · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monte Lehmkuhler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-29 · Bracey - Mixed Cocktail · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Long mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 65.4% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 32.8% of games
8.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 30.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.2% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
20W–16L · 52.2% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
32 matches
Singles
14%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer