← Search

Jeannie Yep

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ellicott City, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
302 matches · 127W–175L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history302 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Monroe - Good 'n Plenty · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Paulman championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-28 · Monroe - Good 'n Plenty · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Shenk championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · 40+ YEPRO · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Weaver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · 40+ YEPRO · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Hwan Yoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · 40+ YEPRO · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Weaver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Paulmann - Sparks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Trimble
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · Paulmann - Sparks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marge Naviasky
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Paulmann - Sparks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Trimble
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · Paulmann - Sparks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Swartz
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-08 · 40+ YEPRO · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Weaver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Paulmann - Sparks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Elliott
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Shenk - Racket Rebels · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Leslie
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
43.8%
21W–27L · 49.5% of games
3.5
34.3%
24W–46L · 45.5% of games
6.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.5% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 43.5% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
43.9%
25W–32L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
21.1%
4W–15L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
134 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
70 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams