← Search

Pedro Lozada

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Harrisburg, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 101W–75L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history176 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McHugh championship
loading the estimate
2-5
L
2026-08-22 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veera Uppalapu
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-20 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veera Uppalapu
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-08-11 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Stegman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · Hershey -Stela's Old Timers - Van Sprang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wilson Wolfe
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Hershey Lines - Stegman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew van Sprang
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wilson Wolfe
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · Hershey -Stela's Old Timers - Van Sprang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew van Sprang
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Hershey -Stela's Old Timers - Van Sprang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew van Sprang
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Ludwig
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-31 · Hershey -Stela's Old Timers - Van Sprang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leonard Shkreli
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · Hershey Stela's Boyz - Van Sprang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Ludwig
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.4% of games
3.5
63.2%
48W–28L · 56.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.1% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 56.3% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
38 matches
Singles
14%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova