← Search

Elizabeth Novick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Collierville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
284 matches · 120W–164L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history284 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Lee/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Sigan
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-22 · Lee/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Sigan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-20 · Lee/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Smith
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-01 · Lee/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-09-20 · Sutton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Glaucia Novoa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Abigail Cardwell championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-17 · Sutton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roz Wallace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-16 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debi Bird
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-15 · Steinhausler/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Bailey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katrina Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Sutton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Barnett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · Nair/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Becky Brady
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
64.3%
45W–25L · 57% of games
3.5
28.9%
33W–81L · 42.6% of games
4.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 33.9% of games
5.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.9% of games
6.5
35.7%
20W–36L · 44.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 26% of the time
#3 Doubles
26%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
53 matches
#1 Singles
18%
50 matches
#2 Singles
15%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams