← Search

Austin Clay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greer, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 100W–67L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history167 matches
L
2026-10-30 · UPTA18FF/McNeel/Butler Springs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natilee Falk
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-26 · UPTA39FF/Auger/Butler Springs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Branham
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · UPTA18FF/McNeel/Butler Springs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bessie Gonzalez
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-12 · UPTA39FF/Auger/Butler Springs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Branham
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-10-06 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Matricciani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-01 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Matricciani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-29 · UPTA18C/Auger/Butler Springs · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crystal Rogers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-22 · UPTA18C/Auger/Butler Springs · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · UPTA40S/Allen/Pavilion · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-04 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Rabel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-03 · UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler Springs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Matricciani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-28 · UPTA40S/Allen/Pavilion · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 65.3% of games
3.5
67.3%
68W–33L · 55.8% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 40.1% of games
6.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.9% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 26% of the time
#3 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
34 matches
#1 Singles
18%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#2 Singles
13%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams