← Search

Dena Siegel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 77W–51L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-10-18 · LA - Cheviot Hills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rhee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-17 · LA - Cheviot Hills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rhee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · LA - Topspin Tigers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rhee
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-10-08 · LA - Topspin Tigers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rhee
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · LA - Topspin Tigers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Nili-Black
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-26 · LA - Cheviot Hills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Brevet
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-19 · LA - Topspin Tigers 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Plummer
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-18 · LA - Topspin Tigers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Nili-Black
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-12 · LA - Cheviot Hills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rhee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-07 · LA LLW Canyon Rollers - Miki Shimizu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Rhee championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-06 · LA LLW Canyon Rollers - Miki Shimizu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Rhee championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-06 · LA LLW Canyon Rollers - Miki Shimizu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Rhee championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.8%
59W–43L · 52.8% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 63.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert