← Search

Francisco Barajas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vacaville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 99W–83L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history182 matches
L
2026-10-24 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Isaiah Barajas-smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Brown
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Ensminger
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jesse Marquez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Isaiah Barajas-smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-12 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Han Yoon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-10 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Lessler
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Raymond Gibson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 18AM3.5B · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cabrera championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · Green Valley CC/Kim/Fairfield · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catalina Barajas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · Green Valley CC/Kim/Fairfield · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catalina Barajas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Green Valley CC/Kim/Fairfield · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catalina Barajas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 53.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 50.9% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.1% of games
7.0
54.5%
42W–35L · 51% of games
7.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.2% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
16W–16L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert