← Search

Ashley Sullivan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stamford, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 100W–33L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history133 matches
L
2026-11-02 · CP:4.5 Serve Me Another:Eilertsen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marjorie Eilertsen
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-27 · CP:4.5 Serve Me Another:Eilertsen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Watts
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · CP:Net Gains 18+ Summer:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-04 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-01-28 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-23 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-07 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-04 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-19 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-10-16 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-08 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Nolan
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-09-25 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Harcsar
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 67.2% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
74%
77W–27L · 57.2% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.4% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams