← Search

Kasey Hamlin-Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
341 matches · 205W–136L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history341 matches
W
2026-11-01 · LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Donahue
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/Urbanic/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hobbs
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellyanne Dix
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Pernell/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Cutter
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-15 · LCTA18/Pernell/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellyanne Dix
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-08 · LCTA18/Pernell/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Cutter
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-04 · LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Phelps
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Pernell/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Hopkins
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellyanne Dix
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · LCTA54/Urbanic/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Donahue
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellyanne Dix
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-07 · LCTA40/Tunick/ParkWest · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Phelps
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.9%
123W–53L · 58.3% of games
4.0
25.5%
12W–35L · 39.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
26W–13L · 53.4% of games
7.5
50%
21W–21L · 51.7% of games
3.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
70 matches
#2 Singles
7%
24 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer