Search

Cody McKee

NEW YORK, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
119 matches · 92W–27L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
55%
stay 4.0
45%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 87% stay · 13% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.91. Lower than today’s 3.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Brod/Gonzalez
2026 18 & Over Mixed Manhattan · 8.0 Mixed
2026
Jhaveri
2026 Tri-Level Metro · 3.0/3.5/4.0 Men
2026
Gonzalez
2026 18 & Over Men Manhattan · 4.0 Men
2026
Jhaveri
2025 Tri-Level Metro · 3.5/4.0/4.5 Men
2025
Gonzalez/Martinetti
2025 18 & Over Men Manhattan · 4.0 Men
2025
FC-Pinecones-Chua
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cody has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Cody has gone from the 93rd to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 65.3% of games
4.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 59.4% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 80.9% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
W
Joshua Zhou / Felix Wang
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Martinetti
+0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Eric Bomgardner / Yibang Liu
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Coleman
0.021below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Brian Kreutter / Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Livaudais
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Nam Nguyen / Jules Becker
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Coleman
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Geoffrey Brennan / Sabian Kosinov
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Gonzalez
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Marc Lieberman / Eugene Shekhtman
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Salvador Mikel
0.016below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Erik Ulin / Yaeger Andrew
2026-04-08 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miguel Norena
+0.054better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Christian Mcintosh Clarke / Shivi Jain
2026-03-19 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Gonzalez
+0.024better than expected — took 68% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Ernie Nichols / William Richardson
2026-03-12 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Gregory-Davis
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Lavinia Barrientos / Sabian Kosinovmixedchamps
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Brown
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jules Becker / Aaron Friedman
2026-03-03 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vidur Mittal
0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Bradley Faskowitz / David Alfonso
2026-02-05 · Jhaveri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Gregory-Davis
0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.