← Search

Shannon Dillard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 57W–90L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history147 matches
L
2026-10-23 · West Homewood - Ponder · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mona Ponder
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-16 · West Homewood - Ponder · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Boney
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-14 · Homewood - Trammell / Granger · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Grace Ann Cink
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-06 · Homewood - Trammell / Granger · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Katzman
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-18 · West Homewood - Ponder · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Boney
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · Homewood - Trammell / Granger · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Hiden
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · West Homewood - Alexander · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carlye Dudgeon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · West Homewood - Casey/Granger · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Whitney Allen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-04 · West Homewood - Alexander · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Rowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · West Homewood - Casey/Granger · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Klein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-20 · West Homewood - Casey/Granger · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Erica Casey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-29 · West Homewood - Granger/Casey · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Morgan Vanlandingham
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
46%
23W–27L · 49.6% of games
3.0
31.9%
23W–49L · 41.7% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
8W–8L · 49.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer