← Search

Melinda Stahl Nix

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Altadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 63W–56L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history119 matches
W
2026-06-23 · SGV LLW Tennis Addicts-Tsai-Arroyo HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Rose
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Hatfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-01 · SGV Tennis Addicts A-Tsai-Arroyo HS/SA8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alma Banuelos
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · SGV Altadena Ashes to Smashes-Minor-ATCC/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darryl Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-14 · SGV Altadena Ashes to Smashes-Minor-ATCC/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darryl Bates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · SGV Altadena Ashes to Smashes-Minor-ATCC/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Jenstad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-31 · SGV Tennis Addicts A-Tsai-Arroyo HS/SA8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alma Banuelos
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-12-14 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerri Johnson
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-12-13 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noel Minor
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-12-07 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alma Banuelos
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-12-06 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherie Paulson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-08 · SGV Sugar and Slice-Nix-ATCC/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valiere Byrnes
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.4%
43W–19L · 56.1% of games
4.0
29%
9W–22L · 45% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer