John Simonetti
102 matches · 49W–53L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add John Simonetti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history102 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams23 teams · 2022–2025
CDTA W 40&OM4.0 3.Tam Bhat Sat 6 $22
CDTA W 40&OM4.0 2.Tam Toba Sat 5 $22
CDTA W ComboX7.5 2.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
NITA E 35M40h Tam (Woods/Rykus)
CDTA E 18&O M3.5 Centennial Sioufi Sat 1 $20
CDTA E 18&O M4.0 Tam Kanev Sat 7 $22
CDTA E 40&O M4.0 Tam Toba Sat 3 $22
CDTA E M18&O 7.0X Centennial Sioufi Sun 1 $20
CDTA S 18&OM4.0 f.Tam Kanev Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OM3.5 a.Oak Brook Franzo Thur 7 $20
CDTA S 40&OM4.0 c.Tam Toba Sat 3 $22
CDTA S 55&OM8.0 a.Centre Court Kao Sun 2 $20
CDTA S TriM3.5/4.0/4.5 c.Tam Reynoso Sat 11 $22
CDTA W Tri 3.5/4.0/4.5M Tam Leonardo Sat 7 $22
IL/A55&O 7.0M/Franzo
NITA S 35M40f Oak Brook (Franzo)
NITA W 35M40d Oak Brook (Franzo)
CDTA S 18&O 3.5M Centennial Sioufi Sat 1 $20
CDTA S M18&O 7.0X Centennial Sioufi Sun 1 $20
NITA 35M40c TAM (Kanev)
NITA E 35M18b Naperville TC (Esancy)
NITA E 35M40c TAM (Kanev)
NITA S 35M40c TAM (Kanev)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 56.8% of games
4.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 39.7% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.