Search

Greg Mikol

Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2024
68 matches · 42W–26L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.35
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
97%
stay 3.5
3%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.30. Lower than today’s 3.35 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams26 teams · 2015–2026
Parker Winter
2026 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men
2026
Hebner MX Winter 2026
2026 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 7.0 MX (FRI)
2026
Parker
2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 3.5 MEN
2026
VTC-Won/Watkins
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
VTC-Won/Watkins
2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
VTC-McKinnie/Heisterkamp
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Greg has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Greg has gone from the 97th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
67.6%
25W–12L · 56% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
John Smetana / Matthew Fling
2026-03-02 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kolstad
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
John Genz / Verena van Fleetmixed
2026-02-27 · Hebner MX Winter 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Gelhar
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
William Schiller / Matthew Ruble
2026-02-23 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Kline
0.025below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Christopher Bogen / Hiroki Kaido
2026-02-02 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Parker
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Mike Smith / June Wu-Britziusmixed
2026-01-30 · Hebner MX Winter 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laine Weinberg
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Derek Fermstad / Brendan Holm
2026-01-26 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Kang
0.023below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Evan Anderson / Mary McDermottmixed
2026-01-16 · Hebner MX Winter 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laine Weinberg
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Andrew Crawford / Bradley Stageberg
2026-01-12 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kolstad
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Matthew Ruble / William Schiller
2026-01-05 · Parker Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Parker
+0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Michael Magistad / Josh Mader
2025-12-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phil Bloss
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Alex Roberts / Feng Bian
2025-12-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kolstad
+0.024better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Richard Lassow / Robert MacHalek
2025-11-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kolstad
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.