← Search

Amanda Howey

— year-end
41 matches · 19W–22L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Amanda Howey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2022-04-01 · MCAC:Double Trouble:Mousseau/Popkova · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Conant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-5
W
2022-03-25 · MCAC:Double Trouble:Mousseau/Popkova · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Conant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2022-03-03 · MCAC:True Blues:Hoagland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-02-24 · MCAC:True Blues:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Taber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2022-02-22 · MCAC:Hoagland:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristina Mousseau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-15 · MCAC:Hoagland:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristina Mousseau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2022-02-10 · MCAC:True Blues:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Taber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-02-08 · MCAC:Hoagland:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marjorie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-03 · MCAC:True Blues:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Taber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2022-01-06 · MCAC:True Blues:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
W
2021-12-14 · MCAC:Hoagland:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-12-09 · MCAC:True Blues:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Doriss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-5
Teams9 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 47.8% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 43.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova