← Search

Martin Gilvarg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 24W–35L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history59 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Hospodor
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-20 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Bramson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-10-13 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Atkins
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-18 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Franta
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-11 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Franta
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-04 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Franta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-28 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Franta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-10-21 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary McHugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-14 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary McHugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-14 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Crisp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-13 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Crisp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-08 · Cambier / Packo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Packo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 31.7% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.4% of games
7.5
25%
5W–15L · 43.3% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe