← Search

Amy Penn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Belmar, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 105W–116L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history221 matches
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Laufenberg championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Vanderbeek
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Clayton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Fellingham championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melinda Fellingham championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Sophisticated Ladies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Clayton
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanna Smit
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-29 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Sophisticated Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Henderson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Husak
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-11 · Sophisticated Ladies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Henderson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Henderson
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
3.5
74.4%
32W–11L · 57.6% of games
4.0
32.5%
27W–56L · 42.8% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.5% of games
8.0
49.1%
26W–27L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#1 Singles
16%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
15 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal