← Search

David Engert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westport, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 112W–50L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history162 matches
W
2026-07-19 · SOL: Tenacity: Schaumburg/Sattler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sebastian Correa
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · SOL: Tenacity: Schaumburg/Sattler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Lehneis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-01 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Lehneis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-15 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-05 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Unni Nair
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
Zhixing Ma / Yuan Ding
2025-09-06 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
Austin Reiff / Vimal Radhakrishnan
2025-09-05 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
Marc Chadbourne / Joseph Radkowski
2025-09-05 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
Neal Rainey / Justin Brien
2025-08-23 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
SAMPATH SUNDARARAJAN / Sowrirajan Srinivasan
2025-08-22 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-08-22 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Slosberg championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
Paul Houde / Christopher Spratto
2025-08-10 · SOL:Tenacity:Nair/Schaumburg · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kunal Maini championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.5%
89W–39L · 59.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
50 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams