← Search

Dana Nichols

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cedar Rapids, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 20W–37L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history57 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Carstensen/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daryl Patten
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-20 · Carstensen/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Wasta
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · Odegaard/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wesley Brackey
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Carstensen/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Odegaard
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-03 · Randall & Ross: Elmcrest · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Damisch
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-11-23 · Carstensen/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Wasta
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-09 · Carstensen/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Cosgrove
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-20 · Randall & Ross: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with STEVEN KNIERIM
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-12 · Carstensen/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Wasta
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-24 · Carstensen/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Carstensen
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-10-27 · Carstensen/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Koopmann
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-11 · Carstensen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Whiteaker
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
33.3%
12W–24L · 43.4% of games
7.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams