← Search

Amanda Berry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Todd, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
235 matches · 161W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history235 matches
W
2026-10-11 · LCRI-Richards/CSD 8.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Marvin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Richards championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Richards championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dawn Jennings championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · LCRI-Richards/CSD 8.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Marvin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · MLKDT-Drag/LNRC Mixed4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charles Quinn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · TLCRI-Richards/CSD · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Delancey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · MLKDT-Drag/LNRC Mixed4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jasen Fici mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · MLKDT-Drag/LNRC Mixed4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jasen Fici mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-17 · LKDR-Drag-Cleveland 4.5 Jetton Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kari Andrews
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · LJHU-Huggins/CSD · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Richards
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · LKDR-Drag-Cleveland 4.5 Jetton Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Janet Szilagyi
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 59.9% of games
3.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 73% of games
4.0
60.2%
53W–35L · 54% of games
4.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 52.9% of games
7.5
81.8%
27W–6L · 63.4% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.7% of games
4.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 68% of games
4.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 39.6% of games
7.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
127 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
35 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King