← Search

Sandy Garland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MOORE, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 59W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-04-18 · SATL55/Hammond/YMCA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raymond Barnhart
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · SATL55/Hammond/YMCA · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raymond Barnhart
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · SATL55/Hammond/YMCA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ron Moore
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · SATL55/Hammond/YMCA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Hammond
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frank Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-09-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frank Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tim McBride
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tim McBride
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-08-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frank Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Groves
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ron Moore
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Groves
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.7% of games
3.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 44.5% of games
6.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.7% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer