← Search

Jamie Thomas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Mill, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 112W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history174 matches
L
2026-03-09 · HPhelps/Sheeler (Firethorne) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Wilson
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-10 · HPhelps/Mitchell (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-29 · HPhelps/Mitchell (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Misson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-28 · HPhelps/Mitchell (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Bowles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-09-22 · HPhelps/Wilson (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Epperly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-15 · HPhelps/Wilson (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Hassell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-04 · HPhelps/Highfield (Firethorne) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Epperly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-29 · HPhelps/Mitchell (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Noonan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-25 · HPhelps/Mitchell (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-07 · HPhelps/Mitchell (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Bowles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-05-23 · AMitchell/HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Wilson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-03 · AMitchell/HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Wilson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
78.3%
47W–13L · 59.2% of games
4.0
52.4%
22W–20L · 49.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.7% of games
7.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 54.2% of games
8.5
40%
4W–6L · 37.7% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#2 Singles
12%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams