← Search

Brooke Baugh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenwood, MS
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 19W–13L · seasons 2018–2023
Match history32 matches
L
2023-05-17 · Powers-GCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Powers
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-07 · Gordon-Travel · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-04-12 · Powers-GCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-03-08 · Powers-GCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2022-04-19 · Gramlin/Adams-Travel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Bagwell
loading the estimate
1-1
L
2022-03-28 · Bagwell-Twin Rivers · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2019-12-21 · Masic-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antonio Hamilton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2019-12-07 · Masic-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antonio Hamilton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
2019-11-02 · Skinner/Sievers-CC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2019-10-21 · Skinner/Sievers-CC · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2019-10-10 · Skinner/Sievers-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Sievers
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2019-09-30 · Skinner/Sievers-CC · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 50.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#1 Singles
22%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#2 Singles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe