← Search

Irene Langlois

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ottawa, ON
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 26W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-03-04 · LBK Public Pacq Racqs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Trivax Levy
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-25 · LBK Public Pacq Racqs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Gleason
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-11 · LBK Public Pacq Racqs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Goodwin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · LBK Public Pacq Racqs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francy Falk
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-21 · LBK Public Pacq Racqs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Assaly
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-02 · LBK Public Goodwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Kieper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-03-26 · LBK Public Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Kieper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-03-19 · LBK Public Goodwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Polly Kieper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-03-12 · LBK Public Goodwin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Goodwin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-19 · LBK Public Goodwin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colette Nemni
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-29 · LBK Public Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colette Nemni
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-15 · LBK Public Goodwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Debbie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 48% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.8% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 48.2% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer