← Search

Sarah Corey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Bern, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 53W–54L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history107 matches
L
2026-10-05 · NB-Hink/Stall Looking for Tennis Joy (18s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Warren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-10 · NB-Hink/Stall Looking for Tennis Joy (18s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Warren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · NB-Hink/Stall Looking for Tennis Joy (18s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · NB-Hink/Stall Looking for Tennis Joy (18s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Corey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-09 · NBCC - Nuckolls · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne Nuckolls
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-06 · NB-Hink/Stall Looking for Tennis Joy (18s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Corey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · NBCC - Nuckolls · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Middleton Hinckley
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · NBCC - Nuckolls · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Middleton Hinckley
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · NB-Nuckolls (18s 4.0W SP) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Warren
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · NB-Corey Tennis Joy (18s 3.5W SP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Corey
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · NB-Corey Tennis Joy (18s 3.5W SP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Corey
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · NB-Corey Tennis Joy (18s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Boles
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 69.6% of games
3.5
33.3%
10W–20L · 45.1% of games
4.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 34% of games
6.5
71.4%
20W–8L · 60.5% of games
7.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#2 Singles
13%
14 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert