← Search

Meghan Young

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hickory, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 181W–102L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history283 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Szalanski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-06 · Bolick/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Atwood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-29 · Bolick/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-22 · Bolick/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Prince
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Tate
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-01 · Bolick/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Stahlschmidt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-31 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenette Swisher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Morin/Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sunday Richardson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Bolick/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandon Bray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-18 · Bolick/LHCC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angie Aycock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marsha Diamonti
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Barefoot
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 57.3% of games
2.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 51.3% of games
3.0
78.1%
25W–7L · 58.7% of games
3.5
63.2%
72W–42L · 54.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 45% of games
5.5
60%
6W–4L · 60.9% of games
6.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 57.1% of games
7.5
52.6%
20W–18L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
45 matches
#1 Singles
9%
26 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer