← Search

Maia Clewley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 6W–29L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history35 matches
L
2025-01-31 · SDNC 3.5 Fairbanks(3:1)/ O'Rourke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Skinner
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-12-11 · FA-SDNC 3.5 Elves Belles @FRCC/ Rice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nalini Brunner
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
W
2024-11-20 · FA-SDNC 3.5 Elves Belles @FRCC/ Rice · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nalini Brunner
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-08-17 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerome Carollo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-08-10 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Chow mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-20 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Busch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-25 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Chow mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-18 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Picunko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-20 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerome Carollo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-04-13 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Busch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-16 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Fosse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-03 · SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Kiviharju · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Fosse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.4% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.9% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–11L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal