← Search

Amanda Stevenson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wendell, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
380 matches · 214W–166L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history380 matches
L
2026-09-25 · Am.Stevenson40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laurene Fitzgerald
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-21 · Su.Paeplow18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Paeplow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-16 · Su.Paeplow18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Paeplow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-13 · Am.Stevenson40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beverly Rubin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-04 · Ca.Brawner40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Samuels
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · Ca.Brawner40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Hatlen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-15 · Su.Paeplow18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-3
L
2026-08-14 · Ca.Brawner40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Hatlen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · Su.Paeplow18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Paeplow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · Lo.Hatlen18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Pytlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Am.Stevenson40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arthur Rubin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · Am.Stevenson40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jorgelina Stroud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 62.4% of games
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.1% of games
3.5
80%
28W–7L · 61.1% of games
4.0
55.2%
64W–52L · 51.1% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.1% of games
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.4% of games
7.5
48.7%
37W–39L · 49.2% of games
8.5
64.7%
22W–12L · 53.9% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 48.2% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
140 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
131 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
108 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King