← Search

Pete Pivaronas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saxonburg, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 16W–24L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history40 matches
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane DeNardo mixed championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-04 · Blazing Raquites · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Anderson mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
Default
2025-12-06 · Blazing Raquites · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-02 · Blazing Raquites · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
Brian Shin / Patrick Boule
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hansraj Sao
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hansraj Sao
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
Patrick Boule / Thomas M McClure
2025-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Kubiniec
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-03-16 · BlazeD Rackets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terry Anderson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-24 · BlazeD Rackets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane DeNardo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-0, 5-3
W
2024-02-03 · BlazeD Rackets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Goetz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-0
W
2023-02-25 · BlazeD Rackets · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Larkin mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-11-15 · Racqueteers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gwendolen Drahnak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 47% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 45.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 65% of the time
#3 Doubles
65%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert