← Search

Christine Pagendarm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ijamsville, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 153W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history270 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Pagendarm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nikki Eyman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-1
L
2026-10-01 · Pagendarm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maunette Makowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-10 · DaRosso - Matty's Baddies' 4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Dietz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · DaRosso - Matty's Baddies' 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Gass
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · DaRosso - Matty's Baddies' 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Dietz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-24 · DaRosso - Matty's Baddies' 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo Roberton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · Lewis 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · Callahan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo Roberton
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Lewis 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo Roberton
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-17 · Lewis 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo Roberton
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-07 · Lewis Tri High · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Dorsey
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-21 · Lewis Tri High · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo Roberton
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 66.3% of games
3.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 41.8% of games
3.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 69.3% of games
4.0
56.9%
70W–53L · 51.4% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.3% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.5% of games
2.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 42.2% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
124 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
60 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal