← Search

Steven Hoang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Diego, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 65W–53L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history118 matches
L
2026-10-31 · SDNC LT RBS&TC/ Carmichael · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Hatcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · SDNC LT RBS&TC/ Carmichael · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashleen Lai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC/ Louis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Hillebrecht
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-13 · SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC/ Louis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trung Vu
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · 2-SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC (3:1)/ Logan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Arcalgud
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · SDNC LLW 8.0 RBS&TC/ Ly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashleen Lai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · 2-SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC (3:1)/ Logan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Valenzuela
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · SDNC LLW 8.0 RBS&TC/ Ly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yan Hoang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-4
L
2026-01-18 · 2-SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC (3:1)/ Logan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Hutcheson
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-17 · SDNC LLW 8.0 RBS&TC/ Ly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yasmin Pakzad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-01-11 · 2-SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC (3:1)/ Logan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Sauer
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-02 · SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC/ Logan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randall Lovas
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
49%
24W–25L · 52.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.2% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 61% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 55.8% of games
8.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.1% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches
Singles
9%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer