← Search

Eartha Washington

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PHOENIX, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 91W–164L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history255 matches
L
2026-10-25 · 3.0 PTC1 Jaquess X40F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Skip Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · 3.0 PTC1 Jaquess X40F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Crannell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-31 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Alexander
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Sornsin
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-10 · 3.5 PAS Backhanded Compliments X18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Siwady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Sornsin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · 3.5 PAS Backhanded Compliments X18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ray Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-30 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Sornsin
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · SPR2passed 3.0 PTC Jaquess X40S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Crannell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · 3.5 PAS Backhanded Compliments X18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Ta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-25 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Alexander
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-23 · 3.0 PAS Racket Science W18S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Alexander
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
37.6%
41W–68L · 46.6% of games
3.5
25%
14W–42L · 39% of games
6.5
50%
9W–9L · 48.3% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.2% of games
6.0mixed
32.4%
11W–23L · 42.5% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
124 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
41 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe