← Search

Justine Cooper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brooklyn, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
316 matches · 194W–122L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history316 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Shuler
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-3
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Hellman championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Hellman championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Shuler
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Marsh
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · Cooper/Trujillo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Marsh
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Shaughnessy
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rene Trujillo
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-3
L
2026-06-14 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Appel
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Trujillo/Vareikaite · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rene Trujillo
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · Eastern/Hirsh/55&Over8.0XD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Sheridan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.7% of games
3.5
72.4%
110W–42L · 57.4% of games
4.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 49% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 50.9% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
53.1%
26W–23L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
14W–18L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
116 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova