← Search

Christina Katz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ottawa Hills, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 20W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tia Rost
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati-Inverness · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Rafac
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Souder/Kowalczyk-inverness · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathi Souder
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tia Rost
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Sheehan
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-21 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Souder/Kowalczyk-inverness · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Seifried
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-13 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Betz Inverness · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Westmeyer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tia Rost
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-26 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Souder/Kowalczyk-Inverness · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deirdre Kusner
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-06-23 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati/Sheehan-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-16 · NWO 18&Over 3.0W Stancati/Sheehan-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-12 · NWO 40&Over 3.0W Souder/Kowalczyk-Inverness · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathi Souder
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
38%
19W–31L · 45.9% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.6% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer