← Search

Lorri Ahl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 105W–84L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history189 matches
W
2026-04-29 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Elizete Groenendaal
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally McKenzie
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-5
L
2026-03-02 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Borrelle
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-01 · Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Harrick
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-03 · Gundell/Seelig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · NC:Sets In The City:Gallagher/Rose · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Guzzetti
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-01-29 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-01-27 · Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Harrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-24 · Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-01-22 · Gundell/Seelig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Groveman
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Chan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.4%
67W–37L · 58.8% of games
3.5
51%
25W–24L · 48.6% of games
7.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova