← Search

Jamie Narcessian

— year-end
15 matches · 5W–10L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Jamie Narcessian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2022-12-04 · WB: Simonini · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2022-11-06 · WB: Simonini · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2022-09-17 · WB: Simonini · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Simonini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-07-12 · WB: Alphas/Zizza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Dow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-01 · WB: Alphas/Zizza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Zizza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-6
L
Valerie Leso / Rebecca Hughes
2021-06-29 · WB: Alphas/Zizza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Dow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2019-07-15 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2019-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Rosemark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2019-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Morabit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-3
L
2019-06-19 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2019-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Wehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Marisa Salvadore / Diana Dow
2019-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Gibney DiColo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams2 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#2 Singles
13%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer