← Search

Jennifer Peterson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elmhurst, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 144W–100L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history244 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NITA E 40W40g Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darci Trout
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-18 · NITA F TLW40c Courts Plus-Anderson · #1 Doubles · with Sara Olson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-11 · NITA E 40W40g Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cherie Vick
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-11 · NITA F 75CWc River Trails-Grasse/White · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meg Griffin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · NITA E 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vanessa Clohessy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · NITA S 75WCc River Trails-Grasse/White · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deirdre Sebastian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Lucente
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-07-28 · NITA S 75WCc River Trails-Grasse/White · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Humpherson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cadden Kapsalis
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-0
W
2026-07-10 · CDTA S TriWLo 2.Courts+ Anderson Fri 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Kuwabara
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia Luchini
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · NITA S 70W55b Courts Plus-Barsotti/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Lucente
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 64.9% of games
3.5
73.5%
36W–13L · 59.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
20W–40L · 42.5% of games
6.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.6% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 53.5% of games
7.5
64.9%
48W–26L · 54.1% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.7% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
66 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe