← Search

David Ware

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carrollton, TX
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 18W–13L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history31 matches
L
2024-03-24 · Greenhill/Sweeney M9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Curtis Powell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-21 · Greenhill/Sweeney M9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Harry Hixson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-03-26 · Brookhaven/Harllee M4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shawn Phelan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-03-20 · Fretz/Goswami M9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shawn Phelan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2022-03-13 · Fretz/Goswami M9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shawn Phelan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-06-13 · Brookhaven/Ware M5.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ron Morrison
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-06-12 · Brookhaven/Ware M5.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Shawn Phelan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2021-05-15 · Brookhaven/Ware M5.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Shawn Phelan
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2021-04-03 · Brookhaven/Ware OPEN · #1 Doubles · with Ron Morrison
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2021-03-20 · Brookhaven/Ware OPEN · #2 Doubles · with Mark Lafavre
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-03-07 · Fretz/Goswami M9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Lafavre
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2021-03-06 · Brookhaven/Ware OPEN · #2 Doubles · with Shawn Phelan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.1% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer