Search

Jeff Mosier

INDIAN WELLS, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
101 matches · 62W–39L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
0%
stay 3.5
100%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 18% stay · 82% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Lower than today’s 3.71 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
CA · 3.5
1 of 11

Jeff is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeff has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 3 moves up and 2 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Jeff has gone from the 91st to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.8% of games
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.1% of games
4.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 48% of games
7.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 61.4% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
L
Ashley Knoblach / Scott Sorenmixed
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Vila
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Todd Anderson
2026-03-31 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.082below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-03-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.098about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Jack Peirce / Danny Hitt
2026-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Ferguson
+0.034better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Thomas Carlson / Peter Taylor
2026-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marty Usher
+0.028better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Dustin Mcnabb / Michael Traidman
2026-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Ferguson
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
William Hitselberger / Martin Buitrago
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Bircher
0.036below expectation — took 32% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Craig Ellis / Joe Panaccione
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Fisher
0.040below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Siboupha Sirimanotham / Karen Roosenmixed
2026-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Vila
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Glen Stock / BILL TERHAR
2026-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marty Usher
+0.012better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Paul McCoy / Thomas Turnbull
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Bircher
0.019below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Scott Hendrickson / Dinora Nava-Olesonmixed
2026-01-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Vila
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.