Search

Fae Sterba

year-end
113 matches · 45W–68L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Fae Sterba to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-06-18 · Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allison Arntz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelly Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-08 · Hazelrigg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Christoffels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Karen Jennings / Beth Stiles
2026-01-04 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-10 · Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-07-08 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-30 · Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allison Arntz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Sandra Zebrowski / Jennifer Christensen
2025-06-30 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Wrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-26 · Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Fuxa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-06-24 · Hazelrigg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clara Hames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-06-12 · Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.5% of games
4.0
47%
31W–35L · 49.1% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.7% of games
8.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.2% of games
9.0
0%
0W–9L · 29.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert