Page Edwards
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, SC
491 matches · 227W–264L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history491 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams112 teams · 2019–2026
CTL (C) 4.0-3.0W 55 & Over (Smith)
CTL (C) 4.0-3.0W 55 & Over (Smith)
CTL18/Creech/CTFC
CTL55/Graybill/RK
LATA 3.5M 55 & Over (Amick)
LATA 3.5W 18 & Over (Wilson)
LATA 55/Graczyk/CAMP
LATA 6.5W 40 & Over (Mathews)
LATA 7.5W 55 & Over (Graczyk)
LATA18/Kleemoff/LCTC
LATA18/Kleemoff/LCTC
LATA18/Wilson/LCC
LATA40/Henderson/LCC
LATA40/Henderson/LCC
LATA40/Henderson/LCC
LATA40/SHEVCHIK/LCC
LATA55/LJOYE/BP
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.9% of games
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 61.7% of games
3.5
57.3%
114W–85L · 54% of games
4.0
12.1%
8W–58L · 32.1% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.7%
37W–22L · 53.6% of games
7.5
35.9%
28W–50L · 44.2% of games
3.5mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 49.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
11W–33L · 43% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
183 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
168 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
133 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
6 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.