← Search

Jin Lee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodstock, MD
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 2W–140L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history142 matches
W
2026-03-06 · Roses & Rogues · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Toledo mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
Patrick Hughes / Jin Park
2026-02-21 · Roses & Rogues · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Default mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-06 · Roses & Rogues · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Toledo mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-31 · Roses & Rogues · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Celso Gutierrez mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-16 · Roses & Rogues · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Litzau mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-03 · Roses & Rogues · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alexander Sodt mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-10 · Rogues & Roses 40 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martin Perrine mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-29 · Rogues & Roses 40 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jin Park mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Sung Hwan Yoon / Jin Park
2025-03-23 · Ro - Roses and Rogues 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Sacker mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-22 · Ro - YEPRO · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Hwan Yoon mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-28 · Ro - Roses and Rogues 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Hughes mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-08 · Ro - YEPRO · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Millhollon mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–9L · 29.5% of games
3.0
0%
0W–47L · 32.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–8L · 27.9% of games
5.5
0%
0W–4L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
3.2%
2W–60L · 34.6% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 40.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#1 Singles
18%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe