← Search

Jennet Jumayeva

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
VESTAVIA HILLS, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
285 matches · 165W–120L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history285 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Kirkland
loading the estimate
4-5
W
2026-09-29 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyndall Spooner Robbins
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-15 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Kirkland
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · Hoover Met - Miller - 3.5 Sat. · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Meredith
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Harris
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nital Patel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellie Adams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Baxter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nital Patel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyndall Spooner Robbins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · LIfe Time - Nowell/Propst · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Glass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Hoover Met - Robbins/Vaughn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Pugh
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 58.1% of games
3.5
59.8%
58W–39L · 52.7% of games
4.0
30.8%
12W–27L · 43.4% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.4% of games
6.5
75%
18W–6L · 58.6% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 51.1% of games
3.5mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.2% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
65 matches
#1 Singles
15%
44 matches
#2 Singles
11%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova