← Search

Dana Andrew

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 71W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history152 matches
W
2026-10-25 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angie Keehn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristi Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · MONTE VISTA HS CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Dayco
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-05 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · MONTE VISTA HS CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Chin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · MONTE VISTA HS 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dong Suh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-08 · MONTE VISTA HS 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brant Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · MONTE VISTA HS 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gurupreet Chabda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Florita Labrador
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dayco
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 18AW3.5A · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.7% of games
3.5
41.4%
24W–34L · 44.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 29.6% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 64.2% of games
6.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 45.7% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 37% of games
7.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Singles
11%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams