← Search

Linda Jacobs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Manvel, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
367 matches · 142W–225L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history367 matches
L
2026-10-20 · LLTC - Double Vision · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Fletcher
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · LLTC - Hot Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-06 · LLTC - Double Vision · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Lowndes
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-04 · LLTC - Hot Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-27 · LLTC - Hot Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-22 · LLTC - Double Vision · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alejandra Lenci
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-15 · LLTC - Double Vision · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Fletcher
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · MPTC - TGI Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mi Ae Roll
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · MPTC - Space City Cowgirls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geri Bishop
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-29 · MPTC - TGI Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charline Chen
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · HFTC - Good Vibrations · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Diaz
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · MPTC - TGI Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Podsednik
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
48.9%
66W–69L · 50.5% of games
4.0
23.8%
29W–93L · 38.7% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
28W–36L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
86 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
42 matches
#1 Singles
7%
26 matches
#2 Singles
4%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert