← Search

REGINA DAVIS

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waldorf, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 84W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-09-18 · Huntington/Myers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · Phung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Phung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Clinton Brown
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Huntington/Myers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Phung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Clinton Brown
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
Stephanie Harhay
2026-07-25 · Singles · with Regina Davis tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Curtis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sonia Roy
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · Curtis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Clinton Brown
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Charles' Angles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · Curtis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Clinton Brown
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Default
2026-05-09 · Charles' Angles · #1 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · Net Girlz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kennedy
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.8% of games
3.0
48%
12W–13L · 47.9% of games
3.5
31.2%
29W–64L · 42% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 28.8% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 66.1% of games
7.0
54.3%
19W–16L · 49.3% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.6% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 25% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.3% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#1 Singles
12%
25 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe