← Search

David Swan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 36W–92L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history128 matches
L
2026-03-17 · Roadrunners 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Girin Barretto
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-12 · Roadrunners 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Girin Barretto
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-24 · Roadrunners 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Girin Barretto
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-09 · Roadrunners 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Baker
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-02 · Roadrunners 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Baker
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-26 · Roadrunners 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Parker
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffery Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dale Christian
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joshua Goodman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6
W
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joshua Goodman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joshua Goodman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2024-12-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Saul Rosin
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
32.2%
19W–40L · 43.3% of games
8.0
26.2%
16W–45L · 42.4% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 34% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams