← Search

Leslie Sarandah

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oakland, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 132W–99L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history231 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Morris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kenly Shankman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-10-18 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Soutter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-17 · CLAREMONT R and S CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kye Heinstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Fitzhugh championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · ORINDAWOODS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Abadia championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Fox
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Euna Roh
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill D Krimmel
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-29 · CLAREMONT R and S 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Fitzhugh
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-18 · ORINDAWOODS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Abadia
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · ORINDAWOODS 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Fox
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 63.9% of games
3.5
57.6%
38W–28L · 52.1% of games
4.0
41.8%
23W–32L · 46.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 25% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 56.7% of games
6.5
40%
6W–9L · 47.2% of games
7.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 55.6% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams