← Search

Roger Johansson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Canaan, CT
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 10W–18L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history28 matches
W
2025-02-02 · SPTC Jacome · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Haymes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-03-09 · Pinellas/Jacome/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Torben Toftegaard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-02-03 · Pinellas/Jacome/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Torben Toftegaard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-01-20 · Pinellas/Jacome/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-12-03 · SPTC Jacome · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with George Jacome
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2022-10-22 · SPTC Jacome · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jan Ambrozy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2022-10-01 · SPTC Jacome · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jan Ambrozy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2022-09-21 · SPTC Jacome · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jan Ambrozy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2021-05-22 · SOL:String Theory:Garcia/Bass · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Hamilton
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-08 · SOL:String Theory:Garcia/Bass · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikolai Fetissov
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2021-04-17 · SOL:String Theory:Garcia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Chew
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2021-04-04 · SOL:String Theory:Garcia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Garcia
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 41% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert